Imaging operations
The bottleneck isn't the order. It's the protocol.
An approved order still has to become an acquisition — somebody decides contrast or not, which sequences, which delays, which scanner, and discovers at that moment what the order forgot.
Where the minutes goWhat this engine cannot seeHonest statusProtocol-variance census
1 — What protocoling is
An approved order is not an instruction a scanner can follow
An approved imaging order is not an instruction a scanner can follow. Somebody has to turn "CT abdomen and pelvis" into this scanner, this contrast agent at this dose by this route, these phases, these delays, this coverage, this slice thickness, this breath-hold — and that somebody is usually a radiologist, working from a queue, interrupted, with half the clinical picture. That translation step is called protocoling, and it is where the money and the minutes actually go.
Fact 1
Done by the most expensive person — for the wrong reason
A radiologist's value is interpretation. Protocoling is clerical translation performed by an interpreter — non-interpretive work that consumes a material share of the workday without being the reason the hour is expensive.
Fact 2
Where bad orders are finally discovered
When the order omits a load-bearing fact — leukocytosis, prior pathology, implant status — the protocol is wrong, and the study is changed or cancelled after the patient is already scheduled. Every one of those is a phone call, a rebooking, and sometimes a wasted scanner slot.
Fact 3
Variation is a quality defect nobody measures
Twelve scanners in one system routinely produce more than twelve different acquisitions for the same clinical question. There is no published number, anywhere, for how much protocol variance a department has — which is why publishing one is worth so much.
Fact 4
The scanner minute is nearly all fixed cost
A minute recovered on a scanner is close to full contribution, because the capital, the room and the staffing are already paid for. Seconds in, minutes out — and the minutes come out of a bottleneck while the seconds come out of slack.
2 — Where the minutes go
Published findings — not our rates
Each row is a third-party measured result with a Source Register id. ARKA has not achieved these auto-protocol rates; the literature has.
| Measure | Before | After | What it tells you | Provenance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall auto-protocoled share | 27.4% | 64.6% | A real institution-wide rules deployment landed in the 60–70% band. Do not promise more.American Journal of Roentgenology | Measured |
| Outpatient CT auto-protocoled | 9.0% | 65.8% | The largest movement is outpatient — across 317,597 CT examinations at one institution.American Journal of Roentgenology | Measured |
| Emergency department | 53.2% | 65.3% | ED starts high and moves least. Do not target the ED first.American Journal of Roentgenology | Measured |
| Inpatient | 37.8% | 59.8% | Middle case between outpatient and ED movement.American Journal of Roentgenology | Measured |
| ED/inpatient protocoled within one hour | 75.9% manual | 99.9% automated | A turnaround metric from somebody else's published deployment — more persuasive than anything modeled here.American Journal of Roentgenology | Measured |
| Optimal protocol selection (abdominopelvic CT) | 88.3% human | 96.2% GPT-4o | Context engineering — not fine-tuning — drove the published advantage (96.2% vs 96.2% after fine-tune, P > .99).Radiology / Radiological Society of North America | Measured |
3 — What ARKA does
Six stages. Four autonomy tiers. Not autonomous.
Not autonomous. The radiologist stays the arbiter. Auto is a standing order a named physician signed — not a software decision — and every auto-protocoled study is reversible before acquisition.
Context
Assemble what the scanner decision actually depends on: the reconstructed indication, plus kidney function, pregnancy status, allergies, implants and devices, weight, sedation history, breath-hold capability, IV access, NPO status, isolation precautions and acuity markers. Note what is not here: any image.
Candidate generation
A deterministic, site-configurable table proposes an ordered set of candidate protocols. Where the table has no answer, retrieval over the site's own historical decisions for similar cases proposes one. A language model may sit behind this interface — boxed, replaceable, and never allowed to clear a gate or set the autonomy tier.
Seven safety gates
Every candidate passes seven deterministic checks — renal contrast, pregnancy, mri conditionality, allergy, physiologic feasibility, sedation, coverage adequacy — each returning block, modify, warn or clear with a cited reason. A gate is never advisory and never probabilistic.
Ontology bridge
Translate the surviving protocol through four layers: the clinical concept → the public LOINC/RSNA Radiology Playbook code → this site's RIS orderable and chargemaster entry → this specific scanner's own protocol identifier.
Tiered autonomy
Auto, Assisted, Escalate, or Return-to-sender. Which tier applies is decided by a rule the site's radiologists have signed — attestation for a named indication class — not by a confidence score alone.
Return to sender
When the engine finds that the order is wrong — not the protocol — it sends a structured message back to the ordering clinician with a one-click corrected order attached. The "are you sure you want to do this?" phone call, fired before the patient is on the table instead of after.
Autonomy tiers
Auto
Protocol applied inside a boundary a named licensed physician at that site signed — indication class, modality, region, gate-clear — at a recorded version and date. Reversible by a radiologist at any point before acquisition.
Assisted
Ranked candidates with the rule that fired, gate results, and losing alternatives on screen. The radiologist confirms or edits before write-back.
Escalate
The engine will not decide. Missing attestation, unresolved gate, non-deterministic candidate source, or confidence below the attested floor puts the row in the radiologist's action queue.
Return to sender
The order is the defect, not the protocol. A structured correction goes back to the ordering clinician with a one-click corrected order — before the patient reaches the table.
4 — The ontology bridge
Four layers from clinical concept to scanner protocol
Layers 3 and 4 are configured per site from the site's own protocol book. That is the honest description and the moat statement in one sentence.
Layer 1
Clinical concept
Indication coded in SNOMED CT or ICD-10-CM — what the order is trying to answer.
Public crosswalk
Layer 2
Public Playbook orderable
LOINC / RSNA Radiology Playbook code — the publishable half of the crosswalk.
Public crosswalk
Layer 3
Site RIS orderable
This site's RIS orderable and chargemaster entry. Configured per site from the site's own protocol book — never published on the public crosswalk.
Site-configured
Layer 4
Device protocol id
This scanner's own protocol identifier. Configured per site from the site's own protocol book. Unmapped cells escalate.
Site-configured
5 — What we measure
Twelve metrics. Baseline capture is mandatory and free.
Baseline capture is mandatory and free. Measured minutes and shares convert to dollars only with a buyer-supplied unit; the product is labeled modeled and never writes back.
| # | Metric | Unit | Definition | Provenance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Auto-protocol rate | share | Share of examinations whose autonomy tier resolved to auto (attested) over all examinations with a recorded autonomy decision in the period. | Measured |
| 2 | Radiologist protocoling minutes | minutes | Sum of worklist dwell minutes on protocoling rows that were confirmed or edited in the period. | Measured |
| 3 | Protocol-change-after-order rate | share | Share of examinations whose assigned protocol code differs from the ordered procedure mapping after the order timestamp (RIS assignment vs order). | Measured |
| 4 | Technologist setup minutes | minutes | Minutes from assigned to acquisition_start on the RIS status clock, summed over completed examinations. | Measured |
| 5 | Scanner slot minutes recovered | minutes | Positive difference between scheduled slot length and measured table time (console start→end), summed when table time is shorter than the slot. | Measured |
| 6 | Aborted / repeat / recall rate | share | Share of examinations with an abort, repeat, or recall status transition in the period. | Measured |
| 7 | Add-on sequence rate | share | Share of examinations with one or more add-on sequences marked on the scanner console after acquisition start. | Measured |
| 8 | Order-to-scan turnaround | minutes | Minutes from order_timestamp to acquisition_start, aggregated over examinations with both timestamps. | Measured |
| 9 | Callbacks prevented | count | Count of measured protocol_defect_resolved outcomes where the corrected order was accepted (observed = 1). | Measured |
| 10 | Protocol variance | entropy | Variance class 2 — dispersion of protocol choice given the same indication × modality × region from RIS assignment events. Computed by protocolVariance(); not reimplemented here. | Measured |
| 11 | Auto-protocol reversal rate | share | Share of auto-tier examinations with a WorklistReversalCapture (metric 11) before acquisition_start. | Measured |
| 12 | Attested cell coverage | cells | Count of distinct indication × modality × region cells with a valid physician-signed AutonomyAttestation, over the catalogue of cells in scope. | Measured |
8 — What this engine cannot see
Three refusals that write themselves
The refusal is more persuasive than the arithmetic. Put these above the TCO model — they are the section that gets forwarded.
Clause 13
Cannot see the payment rate
The protocol engine cannot see the payment rate. No reimbursement amount, payer identity, site-of-service payment differential or contract rate is an input to protocol candidate generation, gate evaluation, or the autonomy tier — and a test fails the build if one becomes reachable from that code path.
Every other party in the imaging chain has a reason to want the payment rate visible at protocol selection. A written, enforced refusal is the answer a compliance officer can forward.
Artefact: docs/protocol-payment-firewall.json · Enforced by CHECK-PROTO-2 · lint:proto-firewall
Clause 14
No auto without a named physician
No study is protocoled without a human in the loop unless a named licensed physician at that site has signed the specific indication class, at a recorded version and date, and any auto-protocoled study can be reversed by a radiologist at any point before acquisition.
Who is responsible when it is wrong stays legible: a named physician drew the boundary; the engine stayed inside it; here is the reversal rate.
Artefact: lib/siteconfig/attestation.ts · Enforced by CHECK-AUT-1 · attestation gate on auto tier
Clause 15
Never reads an image
The protocol engine never reads an image. Its inputs are the chart, the report text and the device record — and a reachability test fails the build if a pixel path becomes callable from the protocol module.
Criterion 1 of Non-Device CDS: reading a prior report is medical information; reading a prior DICOM study is image analysis. The gate stays on the report side of that line.
Artefact: docs/SCOPE_BOUNDARY.md · Enforced by CHECK-PROTO-8
6 — The TCO model
Recovered capacity first. Your rate second.
Radiologist capacity is modeled from protocol metrics 2, 3 and 9 — hours render immediately; currency waits for your teleradiology or locum contract rate. Scanner-minute dollars use a published modeled derivation. Avoided-utilisation dollars need your unit cost.
ARKA does not replace a radiologist. It returns non-interpretive minutes — protocoling queue dwell, rework from post-order protocol changes, and prevented callback interruptions — as interpretive capacity your readers already pay for. This is not an FTE-replacement claim.
| Workforce context | Published finding | Provenance |
|---|---|---|
| Annual radiologist attrition | 1.1% (2014) → 2.5% (2022) | Measured Source: acr-hpi-attrition-ajr-2026 |
| Practices with affiliated radiologists | −14.7% (2014–2023) | Measured Source: acr-hpi-attrition-ajr-2026 |
| Radiologists per practice | +85% (mean consolidation load) | Measured Source: acr-hpi-attrition-ajr-2026 |
120,000
2,400 min
4%
8 min
180
Nothing you enter on this model is stored or sent to ARKA. Rates exist only in this browser session and disappear when you leave the page.
- Metric 2 — Radiologist protocoling minutes
Radiologist protocoling minutes recovered — metric 2 dwell on confirmed or edited rows.
40.0 hr / yr
- Metric 3 — Protocol-change-after-order rate
Protocol-change-after-order rework — metric 3 share × 4,800 changes × rework minutes.
640.0 hr / yr
- Metric 9 — Callbacks prevented
Callbacks prevented — metric 9 count × 6 modeled radiologist interruption minutes (ordering-clinician side excluded from capacity).
18.0 hr / yr
Recovered radiologist capacity
698.0hours / yr(41,880 non-interpretive min)
Enter your teleradiology hourly rate or loaded radiologist $/min to see what those hours cost at your contract — currency is suppressed until you do.
8,000 min
120
Scanner-minute unit cost
Published derivation (docs/scanner-minute-derivation.json) — not a measured site cost
$5.80/minModeled
Two asset ledgers below — scanner minutes and avoided utilisation. They never total with each other or with radiologist capacity above. Each belongs to a different P&L.
Scanner capacity
ModeledWhoever owns scanner capital
Source metric: scanner-slot-minutes-recovered
$46,400/ yr modeled
Avoided utilisation
ModeledWhoever carries total cost of care
Source metric: aborted-repeat-recall-rate
Pending — Enter your unit cost per avoided study
In a fee-for-service imaging department this figure is a revenue reduction, not a saving.
7 — Honest status
What is built, and what is not
A pre-revenue company that publishes its own build status survives a technical reference call. One that implies everything ships today does not. Rows below are generated from the proof ledger.
- Built
ARKA-SIM case package (item 39 held)
ARKA-SIM case package (item 39 held) — dormant training fixtures still execute end to end. Holding the item does not require holding a route.
21 cases · 28 imaging options · 5 cockpit · 8 practice evaluations · 0 drift (2026-08-24)
- In build
Protocol catalog (ARKA-PROTO)
Protocol catalog (ARKA-PROTO) — workforce and protocol-variance arguments are in build. This page must not read as software that ships today.
CT abdomen/pelvis opening cell · catalog + gates + autonomy + ontology bridge in build
- Built
Protocol-variance census
Protocol-variance census — published from synthetic RIS events, labelled illustrative. Free read at the census PDF; not a demo ask.
illustrative synthetic RIS extract · published artefact
This recommendation is intended to support, not replace, clinical judgment. It is generated by ARKA, software designed to meet the four criteria for Non-Device Clinical Decision Support under FD&C Act §520(o)(1)(E) and FDA's final guidance on Clinical Decision Support Software (January 2026). The clinician is responsible for the final decision.
Free protocol-variance read: census PDF · RIS extract specification · For imaging operations