ARKA-INS / Validation
ROI & validation command center
Aggregate metrics from ins_validation_events and ins_pa_history. Click any KPI to audit underlying rows.
Payer view · primary
Estimated annual savings
Modeled$15.1M/ yr
Reduced low-value advanced imaging, prior-auth admin avoided via auto-approval / gold-carding, and lower peer-to-peer / appeal volume.
- $14.2MModeled
Reduced low-value advanced imaging
12,000 low-value studies redirected × avg allowed amount.
- $517KModeled
Prior-auth admin cost avoided (auto-approval / gold-carding)
45,600 PAs auto-approved × ~$11.33/PA (13 h ÷ 39 PAs × loaded rate).
- $456KModeled
Reduced peer-to-peer / appeal volume
3,648 appeals + 2,280 peer-to-peers avoided.
Assumptions (13)▾
Planning volume for a regional health plan / large integrated network; operator-adjustable input, not an ARKA measurement.
Conservative low end of published low-value / inappropriate advanced-imaging shares (RAND/UCLA appropriateness method; ACR Appropriateness Criteria).
Modeled share of low-value orders ARKA redirects to a more appropriate pathway or resolves at order entry.
Blended commercial-vs-Medicare allowed amount per advanced-imaging study. Johns Hopkins — commercial vs. Medicare radiology prices (2021) ↗
Advanced imaging (MRI/CT/PET) requires prior authorization under most commercial and Medicare Advantage plans.
AMA 2024 Prior Authorization Physician Survey — practices complete ~39 prior authorizations per physician per week. AMA 2024 Prior Authorization Physician Survey ↗
AMA 2024 Prior Authorization Physician Survey — physicians and staff spend ~13 hours per week on prior authorization. AMA 2024 Prior Authorization Physician Survey ↗
Loaded medical-administrative labor cost per hour (wages + benefits + overhead).
Modeled share of advanced-imaging prior authorizations eligible for auto-approval / gold-carding under ARKA appropriateness thresholds.
Modeled share of prior authorizations that generate a written appeal.
Modeled share of prior authorizations escalating to a physician peer-to-peer review.
Modeled administrative cost to adjudicate one appeal (within the published $25–$118 claim-handling range). MGMA / Change Healthcare — cost to rework a denied claim ↗
Modeled cost of one physician peer-to-peer review (~1 physician-hour at a loaded rate).
Modeled, conservative estimate. ARKA is Non-Device CDS — figures are decision-support economics, not a guarantee of outcomes.
Provider view
Estimated annual savings
Modeled$1.87M/ yr
Denial-recovery dollars plus documentation-time returned to clinicians.
- $968KModeled
Denial-recovery dollars
1,466 avoidable denials prevented → recovered revenue + rework labor avoided.
- $899KModeled
Documentation-time savings
7,488 clinician hours returned × loaded clinician rate.
Assumptions (12)▾
Annual advanced-imaging order volume for a mid-size health system (illustrative planning input).
Conservative midpoint of the published 20–40% prior-authorization denial band for advanced imaging. KFF — ACA Marketplace claims denials & appeals (2023) ↗
Change Healthcare 2020 Denials Index — 86% of denials are potentially avoidable. Change Healthcare 2020 Denials Index ↗
MGMA — 50–65% of denied claims are never reworked (55% midpoint). MGMA / Change Healthcare — cost to rework a denied claim ↗
Modeled relative reduction in avoidable denials when documentation gaps are closed at order entry.
Blended reimbursement per advanced-imaging study. Johns Hopkins — commercial vs. Medicare radiology prices (2021) ↗
MGMA / Change Healthcare — ~$25 administrative cost to rework a denied claim. MGMA / Change Healthcare — cost to rework a denied claim ↗
Illustrative count of ordering physicians in the group.
AMA 2024 Prior Authorization Physician Survey — physicians and staff spend ~13 hours per week on prior authorization. AMA 2024 Prior Authorization Physician Survey ↗
Modeled reduction in documentation / prior-auth time when ARKA supplies structured indications at order entry.
Assumed clinical working weeks per year (52 minus leave and holidays).
Loaded clinician cost per hour (compensation + overhead).
Modeled, conservative estimate. ARKA is Non-Device CDS — figures are decision-support economics, not a guarantee of outcomes.
Administrative burden
Weekly minutes saved · last 12 weeks · AMA 13 h/wk reference
Reduction vs national PA baseline: 0.0%
Cost avoidance (USD)
Stacked: appeals + inappropriate imaging + admin labor
Click stack segments to trace events. Labor uses $0.85/min fully loaded proxy (see Methodology).
Denial specificity
Specific reason codes vs boilerplate (model)
AIIE-aligned specificity score: 100%
Payer ROI
| Payer | PAs | Auto-appr. | Avg decision (h) | Appeal overturn | Est. annual $ |
|---|
No payer rows in this range.
Annual savings annualized from period appeal, imaging, OOP, and labor components. Date range follows global filter above.
OOP transparency impact
Patient-facing savings and site routing — a differentiator versus traditional RBM: dollars returned to members, not only administrative efficiency.
Cheaper-site reroutes
0
Total patient OOP savings
$0
Histogram uses estimated OOP buckets from oop_estimate_presented and realized savings rows.