Loading…
ARKA Clinical Decision Support is designed to meet all four criteria for Non-Device CDS under FD&C Act §520(o)(1)(E) and FDA's January 2026 final guidance on Clinical Decision Support Software. Recommendations support, not replace, the clinician's judgment. Every recommendation is anchored in a published guideline or peer-reviewed source, with the basis available for independent review. CLIN emphasizes imaging appropriateness at order entry.
This recommendation is intended to support, not replace, clinical judgment. It is generated by ARKA, software designed to meet the four criteria for Non-Device Clinical Decision Support under FD&C Act §520(o)(1)(E) and FDA's final guidance on Clinical Decision Support Software (January 2026). The clinician is responsible for the final decision.
For risk-platform analytics
You sit between many affiliated groups and their risk contracts. Building a defensible low-value-imaging measure stack is multi-quarter work; buying one means you must show methodology, package pins, and a public Source Register your customers can audit.
Your scorecard
The KPIs your board and leadership team track — where imaging leakage shows up first.
The problem
Benchmark-backed pain points tied to the metrics you own.
Source Register required
Your customers will ask where every measure and citation comes from. A black-box vendor fails diligence.
One method, many groups
Each group inventing its own imaging rate definition breaks network-level reporting.
I7 provenance labels
Numbers without measured / modelled / illustrative labels cannot enter a report your customers will trust.
The fix
Each lever maps to a pain above — same order, same grid, so the pairing is obvious.
Every measure definition and citation resolves to the public Source Register. Method pages pin versions you can freeze in a contract.
Identical inputs plus identical engine version produce a byte-identical ledger — your analysts can reproduce the number.
Ship the method across affiliated groups instead of rebuilding risk adjustment and small-cell rules per customer.
The numbers
Modeled or published figures — labeled with their basis.
Public
Source Register
every measure + ROI citation resolves
Pinned
methodology packages
contract-freezeable versions
I1–I11
hard invariants
enforced in code and lint
Evidence
What we bring to the conversation — sourced from the ARKA buyer playbook.
Pushback
The concerns we hear most — and how we address them.
You can — ARKA publishes the method so you can compare. Most platforms buy the defended measure stack and keep the customer relationship.
The measurement layer is designed to sit under your brand; the Source Register and methodology remain the audit trail.
Open /sources — every measure id and ROI citation resolves there.
Your agenda
Three questions to put on the table — we'll answer with your data, not generic slides.
Question 1: How many affiliated groups share one imaging measure definition today?
Question 2: What is your bar for methodology documentation in a customer diligence pack?
Question 3: Where does build-vs-buy sit on your current roadmap?
Explore
Jump into the modules most relevant to your seat.
30-minute method review: Source Register walkthrough, package pins, and how the ledger replays on your fixtures.
Quick answers
Yes — package pins are published on the methodology surface and in machine-readable form.
Yes — /sources is the public register; CI fails if a measure or citation does not resolve.
30-minute method review: Source Register walkthrough, package pins, and how the ledger replays on your fixtures.
